Thursday, June 12, 2008

Tell the White House: No Medal for Pace

What do you get for calling LGBT Americans immoral and supporting the continued firing of gay Americans?

If you're retired General Peter Pace, you get a Presidential Medal of Freedom.

The White House announced today that Pace, a former Chairman of the Joint Chiefs, will be honored with one of our country's highest honors, despite maligning lesbian and gay Americans in uniform.

In May 2007, Pace sparked a furor (and deservedly so) when he told The Chicago Tribune that he supported the federal "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" ban on lesbian and gay personnel because, in his view, gay service members are "immoral," and the military is not "well served by a policy that says it is OK to be immoral in any way."

Pace's remarks resulted in quick condemnation from LGBT allies in Congress (such as Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton) and were even denounced by conservative lawmakers like Senator John Warner of Virginia, who said he "strongly disagreed" with Pace's views. Defense Secretary Robert Gates also distanced himself from Pace's statement, saying that, "I think personal opinion really doesn't have a place here," and acknowledging that Pace should not have expressed his personal views during the course of a conversation about military policy.

Pace, however, never apologized for his remarks, despite outraging many gay service members, like former Navy Petty Officer Jason Knight, who was dismissed from the military after speaking up in response to Pace's interview.

Now, President Bush is preparing to honor the military's self-appointed "moral monitor" with an honor traditionally reserved for those who defend freedom . . . not those who try to deny it to millions of people.

Tell President Bush: Honoring General Pace for using his personal prejudice to meddle with military matters is just plain wrong. There should be no medal for bigotry and intolerance.

Update: Join the discussion about Pace's medal over at My Normal Gay Life, the blog at The Baltimore Sun and on Spencer Ackerman's blog at Think Progress.

1 comment:

lin liyi said...

I can agree rolex Cellini running watches would seem to be to own omega replica uk belonging to the uttermost high-quality, even while primarily billing one designed for rolex Cellini running watches high-quality. Nevertheless it is easy to understand replica tag heuer sale online stores, you can discover merits to help you seeking out an official company, you may already know you may well be qualifing for the sit back and watch you have been paying off without having it an important replacement, and even you have been confident to remain included in an amazing service contract. Designed for a lot of these omega replica, some people opt to hold designed for stylish running watches within a shop some people comprehend they may faith. Then again, most people will shouldn't have a whole lot of rolex replica sale so are commonly taken in via the outrageously good deal. Nonetheless a number of produced using the same do the job for many years, many islands usually tend to burn whole purpose on a amount of a year. You can easily understand stylish running watches web based, and even on shopping malls and even dept outlets, though to be sure that you have been gaining an actual rolex replica uk, you would like to look for any accepted retail merchant.