In
Hartford, Connecticut on Tuesday, the 1996 Defense of Marriage Act
(DOMA) faced yet another challenge. United
States District Judge Vanessa L. Bryant issued a 104-page decision
declaring that the provision in DOMA that defines marriage as between a man and
a woman, thus denying tax, health, and other benefits to married gay couples, violates
Americans’ Fifth Amendment right to equal protection.
The
case, Pedersen v. Office of Personnel
Management, involves six married same-sex couples
and a widower who sued after being denied federal benefits, even though they
were legally wed under state law. The plaintiffs are from the states of
Connecticut, New Hampshire, and Vermont.
Pointing
out that “many courts have concluded that homosexuals have suffered a long and
significant history of purposeful discrimination,” Judge Bryant wrote that the
provision “obligates the federal government to single out a certain category of
marriages as excluded from federal recognition, thereby resulting in an
inconsistent distribution of federal marital benefits.”
Judge
Bryant now joins several other federal judges nationwide who have issued
similar decisions striking down the constitutionality of DOMA. In late May, the
1st U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Boston also ruled DOMA unconstitutional. Then
in early July, the Obama administration made history when it asked the U.S.
Supreme Court to settle the legal fights over DOMA as quickly as possible.
Plaintiff
Joanne Pederson summed up the feeling of excitement in the courtroom after
Judge Bryant made her decision: “I’m thrilled that the court ruled that our
marriage commitment should be respected by the federal government just as it is
in our home state of Connecticut.”
Take Action: The Defense of Marriage Act has been denying
faithful and committed same-sex couples like Joanne Pedersen and her wife the
same rights that are given to their heterosexual counterparts. Take action now and click
here
to urge your members of Congress to stand with Judge Bryant and the Obama
Administration in opposition of this unjust and unconstitutional law.
All married couples are equal. And they should be treated so by the federal
government.
No comments:
Post a Comment